Temperature effect

In: Other influencing factors


The thermal load effect can be switched on for the LESA method. See first, which temperatures are expected to be normal according to the FKM [FKM03]:


Definition of normal temperatures for different kinds of materials

class of material

minimum temperature [°C]

maximum temperature [°C]

fine grain structural steel

-40

60

other kinds of steel

-40

100

cast iron materials

-25

100

age-hardening aluminum alloys

-25

50

non-age-hardening aluminum alloys

-25

100


There are 3 options how to cope with the temperature effect in the Calculation Methods menu:

* No - the temperature effect is not applied at all

* FKM

* Mischke

The thermal load has to be defined so that it could influence the fatigue calculation.


FKM

The solution is described in [FKM03], here only its transcription is done. The thermal influence factor FT modifies the actual fatigue strength:

.

Different formulas are used  for the determination of the factor FT:. Their overview together with the necessary thermal influence coefficient can be found in the following table. The symbol T corresponds to the temperature in degree of Celsius there.


Definition of normal temperatures for different kinds of materials

class of material

formula type

thermal influence coefficient aT

maximum temperature [°C]

fine grain structural steel

1

500

cast steels

1.2

500

other kinds of steel

1.4

500

nodular cast iron

1.6

500

malleable cast iron

1.3

500

gray cast iron

1.0

500

aluminum alloys

1.2

200


Mischke

The solution adopted here utilizes the proposal defined in [SMB03].  The FT coefficient is related there to a decrease/increase of static tensile strength due increased temperature. Mischke proposes use of a conversion formula in the same book for derivation of the rotating bending fatigue limit br from tensile strength Su:

Because of Mischke expects this dependency to be true, he does not hesitate to convert also the fatigue limit by the same coefficient FT. The values of the coefficient are given in the table below for two kinds of degree scales. Mischke proposes a fourth-order polynom for definition over the whole space, but he uses the dependency on the degree of Fahrenheit. The second formula below was thus derived by me (Jan Papuga, author) in order to allow the use of the Celsius degree scale:

The second formula is used in PragTic, the temperature input related to thermal loads thus should correspond to Celsius scale temperature.


Temperature [°F]

FT


Temperature [°C]

FT

70

1.000

20

1.000

100

1.008

50

1.010

200

1.020

100

1.020

300

1.024

150

1.025

400

1.018

200

1.020

500

0.995

250

1.000

600

0.963

300

0.975

700

0.927

350

0.943

800

0.872

400

0.900

900

0.797

450

0.843

1000

0.698

500

0.768

1100

0.567

550

0.672


600

0.549



© PragTic, 2007

This help file has been generated by the freeware version of HelpNDoc