Temperature effect
The thermal load effect can be switched on for the LESA method. See first, which temperatures are expected to be normal according to the FKM [FKM03]:
Definition of normal temperatures for different kinds of materials |
||
class of material |
minimum temperature [°C] |
maximum temperature [°C] |
fine grain structural steel |
-40 |
60 |
other kinds of steel |
-40 |
100 |
cast iron materials |
-25 |
100 |
age-hardening aluminum alloys |
-25 |
50 |
non-age-hardening aluminum alloys |
-25 |
100 |
There are 3 options how to cope with the temperature effect in the Calculation Methods menu:
* No - the temperature effect is not applied at all
* FKM
* Mischke
The thermal load has to be defined so that it could influence the fatigue calculation.
The solution is described in [FKM03], here only its transcription is done. The thermal influence factor FT modifies the actual fatigue strength:
.
Different formulas are used for the determination of the factor FT:. Their overview together with the necessary thermal influence coefficient can be found in the following table. The symbol T corresponds to the temperature in degree of Celsius there.
Definition of normal temperatures for different kinds of materials |
|||
class of material |
formula type |
thermal influence coefficient aT |
maximum temperature [°C] |
fine grain structural steel |
1 |
500 |
|
cast steels |
1.2 |
500 |
|
other kinds of steel |
1.4 |
500 |
|
nodular cast iron |
1.6 |
500 |
|
malleable cast iron |
1.3 |
500 |
|
gray cast iron |
1.0 |
500 |
|
aluminum alloys |
1.2 |
200 |
The solution adopted here utilizes the proposal defined in [SMB03]. The FT coefficient is related there to a decrease/increase of static tensile strength due increased temperature. Mischke proposes use of a conversion formula in the same book for derivation of the rotating bending fatigue limit br from tensile strength Su:
Because of Mischke expects this dependency to be true, he does not hesitate to convert also the fatigue limit by the same coefficient FT. The values of the coefficient are given in the table below for two kinds of degree scales. Mischke proposes a fourth-order polynom for definition over the whole space, but he uses the dependency on the degree of Fahrenheit. The second formula below was thus derived by me (Jan Papuga, author) in order to allow the use of the Celsius degree scale:
The second formula is used in PragTic, the temperature input related to thermal loads thus should correspond to Celsius scale temperature.
Temperature [°F] |
FT |
|
Temperature [°C] |
FT |
70 |
1.000 |
20 |
1.000 |
|
100 |
1.008 |
50 |
1.010 |
|
200 |
1.020 |
100 |
1.020 |
|
300 |
1.024 |
150 |
1.025 |
|
400 |
1.018 |
200 |
1.020 |
|
500 |
0.995 |
250 |
1.000 |
|
600 |
0.963 |
300 |
0.975 |
|
700 |
0.927 |
350 |
0.943 |
|
800 |
0.872 |
400 |
0.900 |
|
900 |
0.797 |
450 |
0.843 |
|
1000 |
0.698 |
500 |
0.768 |
|
1100 |
0.567 |
550 |
0.672 |
|
600 |
0.549 |
© PragTic, 2007
This help file has been generated by the freeware version of HelpNDoc